Archive for October, 2008

What doesn’t work: “Deadly Sins”

Tuesday, October 28th, 2008

“Seven Deadly Sins of Site Design” is the title of both a 10/28/08 article by Seth Rosenblatt on iMedia Connection and an 8/22/08 posting on the ClickZ digital marketing site, by Jack Aronson. The first is richer in content and they overlap some, but both are worth your consideration. (This is also the title of a seminar or two and undoubtedly other articles.)  A few highlights, more like site lowlights:

1. Sloth translates as slow-loading pages (more graphics than make sense) and difficult check-out (donation site).

2. Gluttony for nonprofits would be found in graphic overstimulation.  More info on each page than a person can reasonably consume.

3. Pride — yep, too much about you, not enough donor orientation.  Telling them what you want them to know, rather than what they want to know.

4. Lust can be translated as excessive passion for Flash or integration of the latest and greatest, like social networking links.  Aaronson also makes failure to stir lust a deadly sin … not providing enough “desire data” that would increase your donors’ passion for your cause.

5. Envy — the sincerest form of flattery? A sin when you emulate organizations you aspire to be rather than clearly distinguish your own mission in the marketplace.

6. Greed — I love Rosenblatt’s characterization of requiring people to commit too much … in the simplest operative way: to register before getting deeper into your site.

7. Anger — More like passive aggression.  Talking down to your donors.  Being too pushy or too hard-sell.

Oops!!

Monday, October 20th, 2008

Oops!… I’ve been post-challenged for about a month, a side-effect of migrating this site to another host.  Not enough of an excuse, but this reminds me…

“Oops!” can be a great carrier teaser for paper mail or subject line for email.

Like most everyone, I’ve had to do the occasional remail after something screwed up to a royal degree. In almost every case, the “corrective” mail did as well or better than the gaffe package.

But in each case, the organization never apologized. No “I’m sorry if you were baffled by this grievous error”… no blame was accepted or assigned.

The lead was just “Oops” … we goofed. And as much as I hate passive structure and politicians who dodge blame, “Mistakes were made” has worked wonderfully well.

Our donors are on our side. If anything, our “oops” humanizes our efforts, taking them out of the arena of junk mail and back to the corral of personal correspondence. No need to blame or even explain. Every donor has done an “oops” and will understand.

A great mistake: the printing plates got switched in some screwball way so the letter read Page 1, Page 1, page 4, page 4. “Oops!”

Since we write complete asks for contributions with rationale and emotion on every page, donors understood the problem and gave at a normative rate.

The printer offered to do a “make-good”, free printing, but we still had to pay postage. Worth a shot? Absolutely. Put an “Oops!” on the carrier, open the letter with a brief “gosh darn a goof!”, replicate the rest of the letter, and the make-good “oops” letter pulled in more revenue than the original… and a higher net revenue since no printing costs.

In email, the same dynamics seem to work. And just as “Oops!” is a great carrier teaser, it’s a dynamite subject line, with a higher-than-average open rate… providing a spike in giving.

I never encourage deception. But you could do an email “Oops!’ that goes out with some bit of information that you neglected to include in the first email. “Oops!” Acting much like a lift letter in paper mail.

Try it in email anytime. And use in mail when needed.