Archive for the ‘email/internet’ Category

Great “vote” to “survey” to fundraising …

Sunday, July 17th, 2011

Don’t get me started on what industrial agriculture and mega-processing is doing to our food and health.   Read Michael Pollan’s In Defense of Food and keep investigating this matter.  That said …

I’m an avid customer of my local farmer’s market, on email distribution for a couple of the farmers, who I can advance order from, and for the market organization overall, that sends me little newsletters about what’s fresh this week.

Last week I get an email from my West End Farmers Market, asking me to vote for them for the  America’s Favorite Farmers Market(tm) contest.  The subject line:  We need your help!  They say they’re already ranked high and ask me to help them be #1 in Virginia.

That’s the “vote” part of this.  I say “cool” and click through to vote for West End.

Then the “Survey” part:  On the vote page I’m asked to write a brief statement about why this is my favorite market.  “Cool” says I again, I love shopping this market twice a week, love the people etc and write a glowing review.

When I click to submit my vote and survey, I’m delivered to the “Fundraising” page — a very straightforward gift form asking for a donation.  This page still has the Favorite Market contest branding but tells you upfront that the ask is for something called the American Farmland Trust.   The default gift is set at $50, with a $35 minimum and a call-out that I’ll be sent a canvas shopping bag as thanks for any gift of $35 or more.

I was not familiar with American Farmland Trust.  But here I was a fully qualified prospect for them.  I was on an email file because of engagement with my local farmers market.   I was further primed by the opportunity to make my commitment concrete by writing a testimonial.   I was put in a position to really engage in the mission of the market … and by close association with American Farmland Trust.  And then I was presented with a specific ask, plus a premium offer.

This is great direct marketing!    The ask site could have done a better job of selling the organization and its mission.  But it worked fine because it had good navigation to the American Farmland Trust website, which was chock full of credibility points … been in operation for thirty years, very current news items, clear explanation of their multiple missions which start with protecting farmland from encroaching development but extend to environmental issue and, my key shared passion:  the whole farm-to-table movement.

How could you use “vote” in your communications?  Your favorite yoga class at the YMCA?    A favorite among any aspects of your mission.

Then ask donors this one question “survey”:  Why is this your favorite?

You’ve then primed this already engaged donor for the ask.

Not incidentally, I live in Richmond Virginia, which has five farmers markets that I know about, maybe more.  West End was #3 in Virginia last I looked, with more than 200 votes.   Look at results nationwide and you’ll see that this is all a marketing/fundraising endeavor.  I know about large and popular markets far and wide, Brooklyn NY to Brigham City UT, that have plenty of customers and fans.  These markets just aren’t yet on board with marketing.

Oh, and I did give American Farmland Trust $50 and will pay attention to their efforts moving forward.

Great resources for fundraisers

Friday, June 3rd, 2011

Mal Warwick has been sending a great newsletter for fundraisers for more than a decade.  In a recent email he announced that he’s shifting away from his agency work to dedicate energies to One World Futbol, a charity that distributes soccer balls to children in poorer countries.  Good for him!

I just realized that I haven’t received a newsletter in a while, so checked his archives and, sure enough, the last issue shown is January 2011.  That’s the bad news.

The good news is the newsletter archives are still there (as of 6.3.11) and full of great info for fundraisers.   Elsewhere within the Mal Warwick Associates site is also an archive of articles.   A rich trove of info.  Even those on rapidly aging topics (social networks anyone?) are worth the read.

“Kickstarter” — donate in time or your money back

Sunday, April 24th, 2011

My son is raising money through something called “Kickstarter” whereby people donate in mostly small amounts toward a time-limit target.  If he doesn’t raise enough money, your credit/debit card is not charged.

An interesting way to engage, test for interest, and raise money all at once.

Check it out and give him a Kick if you like.

What to do with online donors?

Wednesday, October 6th, 2010
  • Keep emailing them.  Easy enough.  But try an email campaign, deploying at preplanned intervals, reaching some sort of crescendo around an event…
  1. A real “event” in the world, like an election.
  2. A fundraising event, like a matching gift appeal with a deadline.  (The event is the deadline.)
  3. End of year for tax purposes.
  4. A faux event.  An organization’s internal meeting to discuss the topic at hand.
  • Survey them.  Use Survey Monkey or some similar service to engage / cultivate them or just find stuff out.
  • Blend a survey with an appeal.  Ask if they want to make an In Tribute / In Memoriam / In Celebration gift for a particular campaign.
  • Mail them.   Anecdotal evidence across organizations:  at least half of online donors subsequently respond to a mail appeal.   (One organization’s surprising test result:  Showing donors the mail piece within the email — a “watch your mailbox” email — SUPPRESSED response to the mail.  Go figger.)
  • Phone them.  Those who gave once online are prime candidate for a monthly giving program, using the same credit card they used to make that gift.  Again anecdotal:  13% from one phone pass through the online donors.

Need for “preferred first name” in email

Wednesday, September 22nd, 2010

Because of credit card donations, I’m on record with many nonprofit organizations with my full first name: Daniel.

Essential for that purpose, but I generally go by “Dan” and I’ve been momentarily puzzled by a couple of emails recently like “Daniel to the rescue” and another I can’t recall now that I thought was a biblical reference, i.e., to the Book of Daniel.

The optimum database has a field for “preferred first name” for just this reason.

Fundraising communications are very often to the degree that they simulate personal correspondence.

I always argue that fundraising letters are not written communication, but instead oral.  They should “sound” like someone talking, not writing.    When you read a letter aloud, you’ll hear every false note, every phrase that brings credibility into question.

Emails are not a substitute for letters, but instead for voice mail.   (Disregard emails that look like brochures of course, which can pretty much always be beaten in response by emails that appear to be plain text, though sometimes with a “give now” button above the fold, upper right.)

So … if you want to be personal, you’d better start off with a salutation that sounds like it’s from someone who knows you.  Dear Preferred First Name.

Name drop-ins in email subject lines have a bit of danger in any case.  They ebb and flow in effectiveness, winning for a while, then losing for a while to the same line without the drop-in.

A false-sounding, actually impersonal name drop-in really risks the farm.  Your subject line can loudly scream “I don’t really know you … this isn’t actually personal!” with a formal rather than preferred first name.

Food for thought.   As an aside: my favorite name drop-in subject line is “CDBaby loves Dan” from CDBaby, of course, a web purveyor of largely self-produced music.  A lot of great music not incidentally.

SEO key word help for fundraisers (and all!)

Sunday, September 19th, 2010

Google makes so much available to those of us who have websites.  It’s just so hard for some of us to find or figure out.

Ok, it’s hard for ME to find or figure out.  But here’s one I recently came across:

Google Adwords: Keyword Tool

Go there and key in your url, and google is kind enough to tell you what key words your site contains, who out there is bidding on exposure to words on your site, and more.

Look at the “About this data” dropdown.  Lots of cool info here.  Now, how to use it? …

Do fundraising websites need FAQs?

Monday, September 13th, 2010

I look at “A List Apart: For People Who Make Websites” from time to time, particularly articles about web content.  Good stuff.

A recent article applies to fundraisers as well as all — Infrequently Asked Questions of FAQs.  Author R. Stephen Gracey starts with the assertion that he hates FAQs, but what he hates most is clearly misuse of FAQs, inserting sales pitches in answer for a worst case.

Other points are more useful to the ethical.  Example:  If your FAQ answers questions that the rest of your site should answer, you may have a broader content problem.

Good point on several levels.  People go to FAQs when they are confused, don’t understand terminology, don’t know quite what’s up.  Your site’s foundations should address all this, no?  If you’re delivering content well, you don’t need FAQs at all.

I’d take that as a starting point for fundraisers.  Did you set up a FAQ almost automatically when building your site?   That might indicate that you’re site’s pretty old.  Or amateur.  But consider what that means for content delivery throughout.   FAQs are the last resort, not the first.

Surfing around a few major nonprofits, I find very few FAQs.  Where I find them, they’re pretty deep in the site, related usually to some fairly arcane subtopic.

An example:  World Wildlife has a FAQ about traditional Chinese medicine, including implications for wildlife conservation.  Ok, I might have a few questions.  But even here the FAQ is really just a convenient format.  I don’t believe these are frequently asked.  This is just to old Q&A format for delivering information.  Not a FAQ at all.  But in so doing, it isn’t a misuse of FAQs, just a misnomer calling it a FAQ.

Anyway — Does your site have a FAQ?  Are these questions truly asked frequently, by people telephoning in questions?   Is this important content that should be served up to visitors, rather than deposited only for FAQ lovers or the desperate?   Worth a thought.

More on fundraising for bequests

Monday, September 6th, 2010

Yet more notes regarding planned giving marketing from the recent Bridge to Integrated Fundraising and Marketing conference, this time from a session given by Nathan Stelter of  The Stelter Company.   These are jottings drawn from a presentation largely about a 2008 study about bequest attitudes of  age demos.

  • About 7% of those surveyed plan to leave a bequest to a nonprofit organization.
  • Of these, 73% have not created wills, but plan to within the next five years.
  • Those who have decided to give and made a will tend to be in the highest household income group ($100K+) and generally have a college degree.
  • Age 40-54 are more receptive to planned giving than older cohorts, but overwhelmingly have not made out a will.
  • This age 40-54 is very high potential, largely neglected in bequest marketing.
  • Once a nonprofit is named in a will, it is rarely removed.  By implication, getting named in the will of a 40-54 year old should lead to a bequest.  Just not for a while.
  • A slim majority of those surveyed who plan to give to a nonprofit prefer not to declare that gift.  The biggest reason is that “it’s my business, no one else needs to know”.  (Relatively minor concerns: might change mind, doesn’t want to be pestered with appeals, doesn’t want nonprofit “waiting like a vulture” for gift, just makes donor uncomfortable.)
  • As most nonprofits try to get donors to reveal a bequest, assuring privacy might better ensure bequests from many.  Another good idea: Assuring them that they can change their mind without permission, letting donor manage contacts.
  • “We realize that circumstances change and your bequest to us may not be possible in the future.  Your family comes first.  You can change at any time.”
  • Focus group shows donor interest in good stewardship, return on their investment.  Tell her you’ll keep her informed.
  • The old shotgun appeal is not adequate.  Different age groups require distinct messaging on bequests.

Fundraising: Bequest marketing

Monday, August 23rd, 2010

More notes from the recent Bridge to Integrated Fundraising and Marketing conference, this time on getting bequests.

  • No, your best bequest donors are not the high-household income folks who make major gifts.  Bequests almost always come from people who’ve given often, in small amounts, and you haven’t heard from in a year or so.
  • Profile of a bequest donor:  83 years old, widowed last year, no children or grandchildren.  Never gave more than $25, but gave at least twice a year for a decade.  Great predictor I hear: made gifts in 14 of the last 21 years.  But not 14 consecutive years.  A few people are crunching profiles here.
  • Bequests donors have wealth.  Just not liquid wealth.
  • Something like 96% of planned gifts are bequests, written into wills.  If you have extra time on your hands, pay attention to all those annuities and other fancy financial products.  If not: stick to bequests.
  • Surveys are still a great way to fish for potential bequest donors.  But the first question should not be “are you remembering us in your will?” but instead “have you made out a will?” … “do you have a will?”  The majority of people die without wills, it seems.  If you have a donor who loves you, finding out that she hasn’t made out a will can be your entry point for offering help and getting a bequest.
  • Yes, it’s important to get people to reveal their bequest, and highlight them in your newsletter.  New:  a page on your web site dedicated to bequests … bequest STORIES, that is.  Link to this from everything.  Even chapter web site.  The challenge:  keeping it fresh.  Someone has to pay attention.
  • Anecdote:  At a gathering of good donors, declared bequest donors were given a special tag with the name of the “bequest society.”  Other donors saw this, asked, and many then inquired:  I want to remember XX in my will.  How do I arrange that?
  • There are some very savvy consultants in the bequest field now.  Get the right one.

How to create a very Unhappy Donor

Saturday, June 12th, 2010

UPDATE 15 June 2010:  Ocean Conservancy resolved this with an apology (accepted) and offer to refund donations debited (declined).   Further thoughts in the next post.

I’ve donated to Ocean Conservancy off and on for quite some time.  $50 or so a pop.

When not in a giving mindset, I delete their emails without reading.  Until a week ago, when I opened one that seemed like an acknowledgment.  Oh oh …

With my last $50 gift, I inadvertently enrolled myself in a monthly giving program.  The email was acknowledging the most recent $50 debit being applied to my credit card.

Ok, my fault.  I gave spontaneously and quickly (as almost all gifts are made) and just didn’t read copy that explained I was becoming a monthly supporter.

Ocean Conservancy is a solid group, so I figured I could “unenroll” in this pretty easily.

Wrong.

I went to their website, entered User Name and Password to get to my account info, saw that I was indeed a monthly supporter, BUT …

… I had no way to stop the payments!

A “help” pop-up explained how to stop monthly debits, but the info did not correspond to the options on the web site.  There simply is no “stop” button, as described.

This looks like a Convio donor site.  They are generally very good.  But this site had a serious disconnect.

So I sent an email to membership@oceanconservancy.org, the likely candidate for action.

After two days, no response.  So I called the membership support 800# given on the web site.

“Due to unusually heavy call volume” they rolled me into voice mail, after asking me to leave a detail message, which I did.   Their promise:  a prompt call-back.

Two days later, no call, so I called again, got the same “due to unusually heavy call volume” recording, left another message, with address, UN/PW, and the problem.

Still no response to my message … 4 days after first message, 2 days after second.

Still no response to my email after a WEEK.

So I “replied” to the acknowledgment, an email to webmaster@oceanconservancy.org.   No answer to that yet either.

I don’t begrudge them the several charges/donations.  But I would be a fool to continue to support an organization with a dead-end web site and poor member services.

I’ll post a follow-up.  If anything happens.